go to biomatch.com homepage
Latest biorhythms research by Biomatch
Recent work by Zerrin Hodgkins of Biomatch.com reveals new aspects to the theory: a 21-day Biomatch Mood (TM) Cycle and a 28-day Biomatch Reflexive (TM) Cycle.
Full documentation and research data to support this article are available to medical and scientific researchers and journalists. Click here for enquiries.


<<< previous page  | NEW! Biomatch Mood and Biomatch Reflexive Cycles (page 2 of 3) |   next page >>>

Click on the logo for Biomatch.com - unique biorhythmic matchmaking

Click on the logo for online biorhythmic compatibility test

Click on the logo for VIP-Biomatch.com business opportunity
Why had the 28-day emotional cycle become irrelevant?

The answer lies in the 21-day Biomatch Mood ™ Cycle;

Those, like me, who apply biorhythms theory to their daily lives have been aware that one aspect of the traditional three-cycle model plays a less significant part. The deeper I looked at emotional compatibility patterns within groups, the less relevant the 28-day emotional cycle became. It was almost as if our relationships were determined entirely by our intellectual and physical compatibility ratings.

As a result I downgraded the importance of the emotional cycle. It was clear that I could assess compatibility reasonably well on the basis of intellectual and physical ratings alone. The inevitable conclusion was that the emotional cycle did not exist.

Over the years, any number of pseudo-cycles had been proposed by those who dabble on the fringes of biorhythms research. None added anything to biorhythms theory. None had any bearing on our relationships. All of them failed my tests. Could it be that the traditional 28 day emotional cycle was just one more non-cycle?

By this time I had been investigating biorhythms full-time for several years. My work built on the foundations laid by the great 19th-century fathers of biorhythms theory, Hermann Swoboda, Wilhelm Fleiss, and Alfred Teltscher. I like to think that I took the theory in a direction they would approve of.

My contemporaries definitely approve. Every day, more and more of them were discovering that my interpretation of the theory offered a fresh perspective for those who wish to understand what lies beneath their closest relationships. For them, as much as for me, the problem of the emotional cycle had to be resolved once and for all. So I returned to my data; somewhere within it lay the evidence for or against the emotional cycle.

It was a daunting prospect. All the data would have to be tested afresh. And yet, within two weeks, I found the answer hidden on a previously worked test document. It lay hidden because I had made a mistake with the formula – an inevitable side-effect of too many late nights of number-crunching.

When the numbers were reworked, they revealed a crystal-clear result: our emotional cycle plays across 21 days, not 28.

To avoid confusion, I named the new 21-day emotional cycle the Biomatch Mood (TM) Cycle. The refined three-cycle model restored biorhythms theory to a highly-predictive tool based on innate 21-, 23-, and 33-day infradian cycles. But it left one nagging doubt about the significance of that former 28-day emotional cycle.

<<< previous page  | NEW! Biomatch Mood and Biomatch Reflexive Cycles (page 2 of 3) |   next page >>>

In this section:NEW! Biomatch Mood and Biomatch Reflexive Cycles 
See also:Science behind Biomatch matchmaking takes the guesswork out of finding a partner • The Beckham marriage - is it on the rocks? • Michael Jackson and Elizabeth Taylor friendship • How to Win the Game of Life
info • free biorhythms • compatibility test • privacy • terms • home • send page to a friend• contact us • back


Copyright notice: In your use of our Site you agree to comply with all patent, trademark and copyright laws worldwide. By viewing this page you are confirming that you have read Biomatch.com user terms and conditions.